100 days

in the beginning
he re-created the world
he rested on the 101 day

at the 102 day he saw
the world needed re-re-creation
in 100 days

crisis

all
that's left
= face value

Happy spamiversary! Spam reaches 30

On May 3 1978, Gary Thuerk, a marketer at the now-defunct computer firm Digital Equipment Corporation, sent an email to 393 users of Arpanet, the US government-run computer network that eventually became the internet. It was the first spam email ever.

Election time is coming, so our Heads of State are interested in your opinion. Please respond wise to the poll.

Collect the great bonus for immediate respondents! ; Your spam-tax 2008 can be forfeited*.

Happy spamiversary! Spam reaches 30
	Yes, I consume material SPAM
	No, spam is produced by the Chinese secret service to brainwash the free world
	Yes, spam is an act of God because the internet is blasphemous
	No, spam expresses opinions and provides information. Spam should be treated as free speech under the First Amendment of the Constitution
	Yes, I trust my government let them decide what should be filtered as spam and what not
	No, I am from outer space, please explain why canned SPAM can not be beamed accross the internet
= see results =

*) Only valid for participants with a trackable IP address.



84049655

Plant a flag

The heads of state have decided to plant a flag on the north pole. To sustain the claim to the northern pole of the earth magnetic field. This action supports the ongoing War On Peace, however it requires a budget raise.

Your opinion is valued. Your opinion will be reflected in the one-liners supporting the upcoming elections.

Plant a flag to claim resources
	yes, the flag is sufficient to support the claim
	yes, but adding a fence would help
	yes, but only if we issue north pole postal stamps too
	yes, we have to send colonists to defend the flag
	yes, I trust my government. They will spend the budget wisely
	no, I am from another dimension. please explain what a flag has to do with a magnetic field
= see results =

should the War On Peace (WOP) be dirty or clean?

the heads of state are contemplating about the ongoing WOP. Should WOP be dirty or clean? Your opinion is valued. Your opinion will be reflected in the one-liners supporting the upcoming elections.

should the War On Peace (WOP) be dirty or clean?
	yes i agree WOP is indigenous to mankind. However we are civilized now and we should agree on rules.
	yes I agree we are civilized. And WOP is only indigenous to other mankinds. We should force rules upon them.
	yes I trust my government. They will choose wisely.
	no, I am from an other dimension, please explain the concept of War On Peace
= see results =

p2p syndrome

~~~~

oligarchy